Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberPowerPC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources found in the AfD, as well as sources already present in the article, created a consensus to keep it. (non-admin closure) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CyberPowerPC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page about a commercial organisation not yet shown to meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for companies through multiple independent reliable sources ديلي سبايدر جلي (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I did find a significant amount of non trivial coverage here. I am of the opinion that it's probably notable, although I haven't found 3 clearly significant sources yet so I won't !vote Keep just yet._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I also found the site getting a solid mention in this list article. That combined with the massive amount of articles talking about Cyberpower computers that aren't press releases, shows that the company is notable IMO._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article clearly meets WP:GNG. The subject is notable. Please try searching for sources before nominating articles for deletion under notability guidelines, as noted in WP:BEFORE. AlexEng^(TALK) 19:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG, but some aspects do read like an advertisement. Kcmastrpc (talk) 01:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly meets GNG and is notable based on searches. DocFreeman24 (talk) 06:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly meets GNG. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 18:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep plenty of news sources for this one exist. Jaxarnolds (talk) 09:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.